skip to main content
Back to Top

Decision

Oct 23, 2015

2015 ONSC 6568

Daniels Midtown Corp. v. Mariai

Related Lawyer Michael S. Teitelbaum

Tort law — Defamation — Motion by the defendant for the dismissal of the plaintiffs' defamation action dismissed — Defendant submitted that the defences of absolute or qualified privilege applied to preclude the plaintiffs' defamation claims or alternatively that the action was frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process — no evidence of abuse of process — improper to use Rule 21.01(1)(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure to prove defences of absolute and qualified privilege.

Related Team

Recent Decisions

May
12
2017

Gupta V. Singh

2017 ONSC 2406

In Gupta v. Singh, the plaintiff, who accepted the defendants' offer of $34,000 plus pre-judgment interest at the rate of 0.65%, after a jury was chosen, had her costs and disbursements reduced. The plaintiff sought just over $115,000 fo......

May
02
2017

Sanclemente v. Irwin

2017 ONSC 2249

May
02
2017

Laurin v. Insight Inspection Services of Simcoe County Inc. (unreported)

  • Canadian Lawyer - Top 10 Boutique 2017-18
  • The ARC Group
  • Best Lawyers 2017
  • Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2016

© 201​6-17 All rights reserved | Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Accessibility